One might also want to include in the dark matter things like Canopy, Spyder, Wing IDE, etc.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Greg Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > Python 2 is still more widely used than Python 3, but the sort of people who > blog, tweet, and give talks at conferences tend to be early adopters of new > technologies, so if we were to judge by public discourse rather than > downloads, we would think the reverse. Similarly, I agree the Notebook is > what's talked about most, but I haven't seen any data showing it's more > widely *used* by "dark matter developers" [1] than plain-text editors - I'd > be grateful for pointers if anyone has 'em. > > Thanks, > Greg > > [1] http://www.hanselman.com/blog/DarkMatterDevelopersTheUnseen99.aspx > > On 2016-04-03 1:31 PM, Alfred Essa wrote: >> >> These days most of the initial coding in Python in scientific computing >> and data science communities is done in the Jupyter environment. Working in >> the command line is not how practitioners code in Python. >> >> Best, >> Alfred >> VP, R&D and Analytics >> McGraw-Hill Education > > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org
