There is this one, but besides the name and bird's view similarities,
it is very different from what I had in mind.
http://neon-workwithdata.github.io/NEON-R-Spatio-Temporal-Data-and-Management-Intro/

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Anne Claire Fouilloux
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Davide,
>
>
> For the second part (need exercises like laying some atmospheric or oceanic 
> data on top of maps), I would rather build a Data Carpentry lesson as it is 
> quite domain specific.
> We (Department of Geosciences, Oslo, Norway) are interested in building these 
> domain specific lesson.
>
> Anne.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Discuss <[email protected]> on behalf of 
> Davide Del Vento <[email protected]>
> Sent: 05 April 2016 18:56
> To: Peter Steinbach
> Cc: Software Carpentry Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Discuss] Python intermediate? First time teaching? Core   
> curriculum?
>
> HI Peter,
> As I said the mosquitoes repo is a great start, but:
>
> - in addition to what you have, I need to cover (some) numpy,
> matplotlib, basemap and accessing netcdf data -- maybe more along
> those lines (xarray)
> - for the parallel part, I am not sure I would do anything (I may
> leave it out) -- but if I do, I'll need to cover at least mpi4py and
> maybe more (in addition or instead of multiprocess)
>
> So to keep my students engaged, I need exercises like laying some
> atmospheric or oceanic data on top of maps like these:
> http://matplotlib.org/basemap/users/geography.html
>
> I you think this would be a good add to the mosquitoes repo, great,
> but I suppose it'd be easier maintained as a separate one.
>
> Thanks,
> Davide
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Peter Steinbach <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> Dear Davide,
>>
>> besides the administrative issues, I'd be curious to know what topics you
>> would be up to? And what your target audience is?
>>
>> Currently, python-intermediate-mosquitoes targets mostly modularisation
>> (which should/could/must be split up and the overarching storyline needs
>> more thinking, I feel), defensive programming (which should/could/must be
>> extended IMHO) and concurrency (which in my opinion requires extensive
>> cleaning).
>>
>> I am happy to support you as I think that intermediate material is
>> definitely missing in the SWC curriculum.
>>
>> Best,
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> On 04/05/2016 04:47 AM, Davide Del Vento wrote:
>>>
>>> I have questions about the python intermediate lessons, and the first
>>> time teachings.
>>>
>>> At the moment there are two repos, namely
>>>
>>> https://github.com/swcarpentry/python-intermediate (empty!!)
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> https://github.com/swcarpentry/python-intermediate-mosquitoes (which
>>> says to see https://github.com/swcarpentry/lesson-template for
>>> instructions on formatting, building, and submitting lessons, but the
>>> only instructions I could find are
>>>
>>> https://github.com/swcarpentry/lesson-template/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md
>>> and don't say much)
>>>
>>> Now, I (~= NCAR) need(s) a python-intermediate-geospatial or something
>>> like that. I'll be happy to develop that, and I was wondering the best
>>> way to proceed. One way could be to fork the mosquitoes lesson, which
>>> is a pretty good start for my purpose. Is that ok? If so, does it
>>> matter if I do it as myself or as NCAR (which is a github org which I
>>> can create projects in)? If I proceed that way, how will the eventual
>>> transfer to swcarpentry org happen? Or should I do something
>>> different?
>>>
>>> Note also, that I may need to teach this class (few days long)
>>> sometimes next summer and that I haven't completed the checkout yet
>>> (but I taught similar python classes in the past as non--SWC). Is it
>>> realistic to be ready this way? IIRC as newbie instructor, I should be
>>> assisted by other non-newbies in my first teachings, but of course
>>> nobody will be already familiar with the material. So how do new
>>> lessons get "bootstrapped"? Alternatively, I can get another NCAR SWC
>>> instructor (still not checked out yet), who is familiar with the
>>> material. That would be two newbies, is it acceptable?
>>>
>>> Any other suggestions? I will be ok to teach the material as non-SWC
>>> for this time, as last resort. Actually this "last resort" may still
>>> be the best, since we just taught git to the audience for this python
>>> class (non-SWC since we weren't ready to do it that way), and they
>>> already are proficient enough in shell (which actually they are
>>> deprecating, in favor or using python, maybe with plumbum, for
>>> everything, not only the geospatial stuff), so they would not be
>>> interested in git or shell. So, are there exceptions to the "must
>>> cover the core of Software Carpentry's curriculum" rule?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Davide
>>> PS: boy that's way more than I had in mind for this message, I kept
>>> adding to the subject... Feel free to split the answers under 3
>>> separate conversations, if appropriate.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.software-carpentry.org

Reply via email to