Some here might find this of interest - about a retraction as a result of incorrect statistics in R (although in this case, from my reading, it's the stats rather than an actual bug in the code), with some thoughts at the end about whether journals should require code review.
http://retractionwatch.com/2016/12/08/sinking-feeling-gut-diary-retraction/ -- Simon Waldman / [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> PhD Researcher, ICIT / Heriot-Watt University ________________________________ Founded in 1821, Heriot-Watt is a leader in ideas and solutions. With campuses and students across the entire globe we span the world, delivering innovation and educational excellence in business, engineering, design and the physical, social and life sciences. The contents of this e-mail (including any attachments) are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of its contents is strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately and then delete it (including any attachments) from your system.
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.software-carpentry.org/listinfo/discuss
