Regardless of any comments I might make on the paper, I wholeheartedly
agree with the summary:

For example, the results of our self-reflective questions suggest that
> students appreciate examples, and we have found some evidence that
> straightforward examples may benefit students more than a clearly written
> description. We also suggest that key terminology should be carefully
> defined and that the length of the problem description and the complexity
> of language used in the description be minimized.
>

At least in my area, this fits well with both criticism of academic CS
classes and with the reception to our more example-based and in-context
training efforts.


On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Amy E. Hodge <[email protected]> wrote:

> Fascinating.
>
>
>
> ~ Amy
>
>
>
> Amy E. Hodge, PhD
> *Science Data Librarian*
>
> [email protected]
>
> 650.556.5194
>
>  orcid.org/0000-0002-5902-3077
>
>
>
> Data Management Services
> Branner Earth Sciences Library, 212 Mitchell
> 397 Panama Mall; MC 2211
> Stanford University
> Stanford, CA 94305
>
>
>
> *From: *Discuss <[email protected]> on behalf
> of Greg Wilson <[email protected]>
> *Date: *Tuesday, December 5, 2017 at 9:19 AM
> *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]
> carpentry.org>
> *Subject: *[Discuss] Familiar Contexts and the Difficulty of Programming
> Problems
>
>
>
> A result that may be of use in designing Carpentry lessons (from
>
> https://doi.org/10.1145/3141880.3141898):
>
>
>
> Intuition suggests that problems from a familiar context should be
>
> easier to solve than the same problems described using an unfamiliar
>
> domain. However, prior work on contextualized programming problems has
>
> found little evidence to support this hypothesis. In this paper, we
>
> extend this work by exploring the use of a particular familiar
>
> context: problem domains used earlier in an introductory programming
>
> course. We conduct a crossover design study in a large introductory
>
> programming course to compare problems with and without context
>
> related to previous coursework. Our results suggest that any advantage
>
> conveyed by a familiar context is dominated by other factors, such as
>
> the complexity of terminology used in the description, the length of
>
> the problem description, and the availability of examples. This
>
> suggests that educators should focus on simplicity of language and the
>
> development of examples, rather than seeking contexts that may aid in
>
> understanding problems.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Discuss mailing list
>
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.software-carpentry.org/listinfo/discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.software-carpentry.org/listinfo/discuss
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.software-carpentry.org/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to