> So any stardard is going to break no matter what you do. Which is why > I liked the Lucent one. There was no standard name, which meant no > standard expecations to break.
The only thing I didn't like about the lucent one was ... at first, the name was chosen by HR. The naming convention I use for my users is: User chooses their username, which must be unambiguously based on their real name, and max 8 characters. This way, you can see any file owned by jsmith, and you'll unambiguously know it belongs to John. Users are all coming from somewhere, and they prefer to have the same username at different locations. So why should I be eharvey at one company, and harveyed at some other company? _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
