Phil Pennock wrote: > On 2010-04-18 at 11:42 -0600, Yves Dorfsman wrote: >> addresses on the public internet. I only used one, so I turned that off, and >> pointed to a public stun server (who fund those? all of them seems to be >> aliases to an amazon EC2 node!), > > stun.l.google.com > > I'm fairly sure that's not an Amazon EC2 node. ;) > > I also don't know whether or not that's a publicly supported interface > or an implementation detail, but it currently works. I'm not in a > position to give any promises about whether it will continue to work.
Does it? Not working for me: > stun stun.l.google.com STUN client version 0.96 Primary: Blocked or could not reach STUN server Return value is 0x00001c > stun stun.xten.net STUN client version 0.96 Primary: Indepndent Mapping, Port Dependent Filter, preserves ports, no hairpin Return value is 0x000017 -- Yves. http://www.SollerS.ca/ _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
