Ok Pete, thanks a lot. Geez your making me give this more thought than I was before. Having the ability to choose those areas sounds interesting and how you'd do that is even more fascinating. So I gather dealing with OP isnt' to bad, I sure wish the SE version gave a better feel for the full version, but at first look it appears to be more a bummer than anything else. I'm hoping a new version of OP will be out and maybe if we can get to them early in the game, they'll do something about making it more VO friendly. I plan to dig into this you can bet.

tnx


Scott



On Apr 5, 2006, at 11:12 PM, Pete Horrocks wrote:

np Scott,

i started out using RI too, but there is so much more you can do with OP, like zoning out only the sections that you want to have read, you can even have OP read your scanned document and it reads it in the order you have it zoned, it uses the Macs built in Voice Over to do this. and you can save it in many formats for other programs to open. if you have any questions once you start using OP feel free to use me, i'll help where i can.


Pete


On Apr 5, 2006, at 5:59 PM, Scott Howell wrote:

Thanks Pete. I am currently using Read Iris which as far as I can tell is doing a good job, but there are some features in Omni Page I'm interested in. I might consider trying it seeing as how they have a 30-day return policy so at least if it really is a drag, I can return it and no hard feelings.grin


Scott



On Apr 5, 2006, at 4:57 PM, Pete Horrocks wrote:

Hey Scott,

I have used OmniPage. so far i have had pretty good luck with it. you do have to work with it some, by that i mean you have to select the zones and the format of the zones, but even that is not to hard to do. i wish some one would write some ocr software that would read my mind and do exactly what i want it to do without any work on my part, but maybe some day!!! i guess the only complaint that i have with it so far is that i am just to lazy.

please feel free to ask any questions, don't know if i will have the answers but i will try.

Pete






Reply via email to