Check this out.

Security Company Recommends Macs 
By Walaika K. Haskins 
July 5, 2006 3:30PM 

"There are far, far fewer threats on Apple Macs than there are on PCs," said 
Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos. "So home users who
simply want a computer to do some Web surfing, exchange e-mails, take 
photographs, buy music, or make movies may find it's a much simpler life from 
the
malware point of view if they used a Mac instead of a PC." 

 A new breed of malicious software has replaced viruses and worms as the weapon 
of choice for Internet criminals looking to steal money from unsuspecting
netizens, according to a study published Wednesday by security firm Sophos. 

The report found that during the first half of 2006, the number of new worms 
and viruses emerging on the Internet dropped significantly, overshadowed by
a new, dangerous species of Trojan horse. These Trojans, according to Sophos, 
now outnumber other new viruses and worms by a four-to-one margin. 

In light of all the new malicious software targeting Windows PCs, Sophos 
recommended in the report that Windows users swap their current systems for a 
Mac.
Making the switch to a Mac, the company said, will help safeguard against the 
new breed of attacks. 

"Because there are so many poorly protected home computers out there running 
Windows, the hackers haven't had to write Mac versions of their viruses," said
Graham Cluely, senior technology consultant at Sophos. 

Trojans on the Rise 

Last month, Sophos identified 180,292 different types of malicious code 
actively circulating on the Internet, representing an increase of more than 
40,000
over June 2005. The bulk of these ne'er-do-well programs are written to target 
Windows users. 

"The criminals responsible are obviously making money from their code, 
otherwise they'd give up the game," Cluley said. 

During the first six months of 2006, Trojans accounted for some 82 percent of 
new threats. Hackers prefer this type of malicious software, Sophos found,
because it can be targeted at a particular group of people to increase the 
likelihood of tricking users into handing over information. 

Unlike the old days of computer viruses when hackers wrote and released their 
malware in a quest to grab headlines and impress their peers, today's malicious
code writers want as little publicity as possible, Cluley noted. 

"If a virus makes the front page of the New York Times, that's bad news for 
today's hackers," he said. "They don't want users to be aware of what they're
up to, so they like to infect a smaller group of people and steal from them 
(identities, bank account information, and so forth) without them realizing
that they have been infected at all." 

Choose a Mac 

Cluley said that, after years of recommending that users take steps to better 
protect their computers with constantly updating security software, it is
clear that most users are not listening. 

"Every antivirus program on the planet detects [the older viruses], but clearly 
some PC home users aren't running any effective antivirus [software] at
all or haven't bothered updating it," Cluley said. "So why not switch to a 
computer which simply cannot be infected by these threats?" 

The Sophos report indicated that the first malicious software targeting Apple's 
Mac OS X did not emerge until February 2006. The company also found that,
in contrast to predictions from the SANS Institute and other security 
companies, there has been no deluge of viruses targeting the Mac. 

Odds are, Cluley predicted, that Macs will "continue to be the safer place for 
computer users" for some time to come. 

"There are far, far fewer threats on Apple Macs than there are on PCs," he 
said. "So home users who simply want a computer to do some Web surfing, exchange
e-mails, take photographs, buy music, or make movies may find it's a much 
simpler life from the malware point of view if they used a Mac instead of a PC."




Visit my home page at http://www.disabilitynation.net and subscribe to The 
DisabilityNation Podcast.

Reply via email to