This is also somewhat alarming for those of us who have just taken
the plunge and invested in the new Apple hardware. Are they now
telling us they've made a bad error of judgement, didn't research
their new platforms before deciding to make the switch? And of
course it begs the question ... what about future compatibility?
On 3 Aug 2006, at 22:14, Travis Siegel wrote:
Just my two cents worth, based on nothing but observation and
guesswork.
Will apple switch to sparc? Could be, if they do, they'll probably
go back to ppc and wrok the conversion from there. It would have
made sence for them to make this switch in the first place instead
to intels, since as the article mentions, sparc archetecture is
much closer to ppc than is intel. This is why the intel
announcement took so many folks by surprise.
The sparc one really doesn't surprise me, though it does beg the
question,
Why waste all that time porting to intel just to throw it away and
go where they should have gone in the first if they really were
looking for a processor switch?
I'm thinking Apple is feeling a bit lost. Their performance gains
weren't what they expected for the switch to intel (thus all the
dual core chips put into the macs, to bring performance up where
they wanted and expected it to be in the first place)
Will sparc give apple more bang for the buck?
Well, yes and no.
Sparc processors certainly will help the speed of the machines, but
the price of the sparc processors is probably a considerable chunk
more than intel processors of similar speeds. This isn't going to
make macs any cheaper, and in fact, will probably close to double
prices.
Add the memory used in sparc machines (I don't remember what kind
it is, but it won't fit in a pc running an intel motherboard) and
you've got a price crunch waiting to happen.
It may be the right thing to do, but I don't believe it's the smart
thing to do at this point.
Apple should hang on to the intel crowd for a couple years, to
boost confidence in it's product lines. Give it 3-5 years first,
then make the sparc transition.
This won't help apple become the undisputed leader in quality
graphical processing they've had for years, but it will bring them
a lot closer to the mainstream, and probably win them a large
number of converts. Then when the new switch happens, a nice
segment of the new converts will be happy to come with them.
Making such a change now is going to alienate a *lot* of users who
were looking forward to the intel compatibility side of macs.
This is a very poor business decision on apple's part at this point
in time.
I have more to say, but I'll cut off the rant here, to prevent
elaboration that really isn't necessary anyhow. The essential
points have been covered.
===================================
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Telephone ... +44-1642-688-012
U.S. Phone ... +1-212-202-2344
Fax ... +44-1642-919-606
Mobile Phone ... +44-7894-743-882
Mobile Phone ... +44-7932-634-539
MSN ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype ... tftbbs
http://www.tft-bbs.co.uk
----------------------------------------
________________________________________________________________
Did you know! This message could have been secured by the TFT BBS Digital
Security Initiative. To secure
future messages from this sender, please click this link:
https://keys.tft-bbs.co.uk:10040/b/b.e?r=discuss%40macvisionaries.com&n=FHpPXzaq7WxmpBCgDgtHeg%3D%3D
