>different philosophies, and one that neither you nor Josh can really
argue against.  Classic power of the purse, from a large and
>civic-minded customer.
OK, was wondering exactly how they pressured Microsoft into making win95
accessible.
-- Rich

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Access Curmudgeon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by
theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: New phone / accessibility issues


> Rich, I want to clear up a couple potential misconceptions from your
> last post on this thread.
>
> 1)  Undue burden is, in fact, an accepted exception for not providing
> accessibility or accommodation.  Fortunately, this is a very high bar,
> and it is not enough to claim undue burden, an agency must prove it.
>
> 2)  There are regulations that require certain consumer-oriented
> telecommunication products, like telephones and televisions, to be
> accessible.  These law require accessibility only when it is readily
> achievable, and not even all models in every circumstance.
>
> 3)  There is no law that generally requires consumer electronics to be
> accessible.  There are, of course, plenty of inaccessible MP3 players
> for example.  Even computers are not regulated this way.
>
> 4)  The Federal government, and many state governents, have formal
> policies of only purchasing accessible technology.  They do not
> require that an OS be accessible in order to be sold to the public,
> but they do require that an OS be accessible for *them* to buy it.
>
> Did you read that story I cited early today?  Here is the link again:
>
http://blogs.sun.com/korn/date/20051113#Massachusetts_Accessibility_Background
>
> The Massachusetts state government didn't legally require Microsoft to
> make Windows 95 accessible.  They said that they would not be buying
> it themselves, until and unless it was accessible.  Completely
> different philosophies, and one that neither you nor Josh can really
> argue against.  Classic power of the purse, from a large and
> civic-minded customer.
>
>


Reply via email to