Jim is the author of the skip nav idea which he is hugely proud of.
What is your point of mentioning that?
Look, there is accessibility and than there is Accessibility.
If you cannot articulate your thoughts better than that, please do not bother trying. You are wasting your time, and ours.
Anytime there is a law, it is a two edged sword.
There can be downsides to laws, but presumably the good outweighs the bad. If that was not routinely the case, society would not bother with laws.
It limits action to only what is required by law.
That is nonsense. Enlightened actors can, and will, go beyond the bare minimum. Could we please bring this thread back to its subject? What might FCC to improve their services to people with disabilities? Does the FCC have any policies or practices that are prejudice against minority screen reader users as compared to folks with the latest version of Window Eyes or Jaws? Thanks!
