Actually your correction of my paraphrase makes you sound even more bias and equivocating. But oh well, I shouldn't be surprised.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josh de Lioncourt Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 7:28 PM To: General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by the blind Subject: Re: Macs and a Viable Alternative for State Agencies to Consider On Jun 20, 2007, at 11:06 AM, Abdul Kamara wrote: > There can be no better exemplar for lack of objectivity than the > person who is of the notion that Macs are used by a higher percentage > of creative people. > > And there can be no greater evidence of someone who is picking a > fight than he who deliberately misrepresents another's statements. > If you had read my previous messages, I said quite plainly that I > thought it likely a higher number of Mac users were creative, not that > a higher number of creative people use Macs versus Windows. I ahve > stated evidence as to why this is so. You continue to look to start a > problem and I'm with John. I'm done debating with someone who is > clearly not interested in real discussion.
