I mean thatit seems to only say one line when there ought to be a
multiple line output response to a command, except for ls.
Maybe it's just me. :)
Jane
On Nov 10, 2007, at 8:53 PM, David Poehlman wrote:
Not sure what you mean? It is a bit choppy but way better than it
was in tiger. You are not being difficult.
On Nov 10, 2007, at 6:50 PM, Jane Jordan (gmail) wrote:
I don't mean to be difficult, but it seems to have trouble keeping
up with commands if they are multiple lines long or somethign. For
instance, when I start up my own muck, it doesn't tell me what's
happening, I just hav e to hope it's connec ted when I use the mu*
client, Nun tius.
Jane
On Nov 9, 2007, at 9:37 AM, Greg Kearney wrote:
Yes the terminal is now fully reviewable by word or line. It also
will now read the results of a command as they are issued.
Greg Kearney
535 S. Jackson St.
Casper, Wyoming 82601
307-224-4022
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 9, 2007, at 7:08 AM, John Heim wrote:
Does anyone who has a copy of leopard know if the terminal window
works better now? I probably do 90% of my real work in a terminal
window and about 50% of the stuff i do just for fun. The
awkwardness of the terminal window in tiger was a deal killer for
me.
