Hi everyone. I have jaws 8.0 working through fusion. jaws cursor works
fine too. my setup is a macbook pro 2.0 gig running os 10.5 leopard,
vmware fusion 1.1. i basically set up bootcamp partition from earlier
beta on 10.4 tiger, then installed all the screen access progs through
bootcamp. then ran fusion and chose to use the bootcamp partition for
my virtual machine. i just let fusion install the vmware tools and
create its virtual machine, then when the machine restarted, jaws
needed to reinstall video intercept, so did that and a final restart,
then everything seemed to work ok. hope this helps anyone planning to
try the same kind of thing.

cheers

thuy

On 18/11/2007, hank smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what version?
> and does the jaws cursor read okay?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by
> theblind" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 8:49 AM
> Subject: Re: Problems with JAWS-Driver on MAC Intel and Parallels
>
>
> > The JAWS demo seems to work fine in VMWare Fusion.
> >
> > --
> > Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
> >
> > Greg Kearney wrote:
> >> I believe that JAWS only works when used in a partitioned drive with
> >> BootCamp not in a virtualized environment like Parallels.
> >>
> >>
> >> Greg Kearney
> >> 535 S. Jackson St.
> >> Casper, Wyoming 82601
> >> 307-224-4022
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Nov 18, 2007, at 3:41 AM, Frank Marrenbach wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hallo,
> >>>
> >>> JAWS do not want to work coorectly on my Mac Intel in the Parallels
> >>> inviroment.
> >>> JAWS can not install the speicial graphics drier and send a
> >>> DCERR-Generall eror!
> >>> (Problems wiht driver chain?)
> >>>
> >>> How can I get JAWS working correctly?
> >>>
> >>> MAC PRO Intel 2,6 Ghz,
> >>> Paralles 3.0 / Windows XP and JAWS 7.1
> >>>
> >>> Changing to ATI drivers does not heöp!
> >>>
> >>> Thank you!
> >>>
> >>> Yours
> >>> Frank Marrenbach
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to