You can always upgrade the RAM and see a performance boost. You can of course do it now or later.
On Dec 5, 2007, at 11:17 AM, Josh de Lioncourt wrote:


While not specifically the same jump as you are talking about, I think it is close enough to comment. I have both a Mac Mini PPC 1.43GHZ and a MacBook Intel 2.0GHZ. The difference in speed and general performance is astonishing. Everything is faster, more responsive, and just overall a hell of a lot better. The difference will probably not be quite as dramatic in your case, I think it will still be very substantial. Everything runs better on the Intel systems.


Josh de Lioncourt
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

...my other mail provider is an owl...



On 5 Dec, 2007, at 7:46 AM, Cheryl Homiak wrote:


Hi all.

I might have the option of buying an Intel mac mini. It isn't the fastest available model or fully loaded (only combo drive and 1gb memory) but I don't forsee being able to buy a fully-loaded brand new machine in the near future. What I want to know is whether people think I will see enough difference in voiceover and operation of the mac (mostly I'm talking about time loading apps and busy signals) to make it worth it. my present machine is a 1.66GHZ ppc and the machine I could buy is a 1.83GHZ intel. I do see some definite pluses just in the fact that the sound system is somewhat better on the Intel and there are more usb ports, but I'd like to know whether I'd see enough difference in day-to-day operation to make it worth buying the Intel. I'm also thinking that as time goes on more things will be doable on the Intel that aren't on the ppc. I did some research and read some reviews of general Mac users who used a ppc mini and then moved to an intel and these reviews were overwhelmingly positive as to having moved to the Intel machine, but I'd like feedback specifically from users who are blind. I'd really appreciate feedback, especially from people who have used both a ppc mini and an intel one.
Tia.



--
Cheryl

"Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also."






Reply via email to