You want an honest answer, then I will give you one. In my opinion, Leopard is most certainly worth upgrading too. I've seen significant improvements and I do not for even a minute regret upgrading. Is Leopard perfect, no, but when you consider where Apple was with Tiger and where they are with Leopard, it shows that Apple is very much committed to accessibility and it shows. And lets not neglect to mention that for the cost of the upgrade at $129 or even a family pack at $199, you are paying a small price in some cases just to update a windows-based screen reader. Also, for that upgrade, you are getting more than an upgrade for features etc. of the screen reader, you are getting a vast number of feature enhancements, new features, of the os and applications.

On Jan 13, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Cheryl Edwards wrote:

Hi all,
Same message just reposted with the correct subject for the sake of archiving and accessing correct information.

*******

Hi all,
As stated in previous posts I've not yet upgraded to Leopard. Rather, I've been watching the list to see what kind of report you all would give it. Unless I've missed something there hasn't been such a post, so I'm going to ask a straight-forward question or two.

1.  Do you find a vast improvement in the new OS?
2. If so, is that improvement in stability, accessibility, or interaction and functionality?
3.  Are there disadvantages to Leopard?
4. Is there not enough significant change to warrant an upgrade right now?

I understand Mac loyalty for those of us who are die-hard long-time users,, as well as appreciation for the VoiceOver team and all they've done and are doing; however, honesty is honesty and I would really appreciate some "where the rubber meets the road" answers, please. There's been some reviews by folk who don't use VoiceOver, but do use the Mac, that give it a thumbs-down, saying that Apple released it too soon and that one should wait for the next upgrade. There's a lot said about its beauty and such, but that isn't my focus. I'm just not wanting to trade the accessibility and functionality I already have for something less or more frustrating.

Thanks for any input you would like to give,
Cheryl E.





Cheryl Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Scott Howell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Reply via email to