Marketing is part of your answer.  In fact, I am not even certain the name 
word processor is even used anymore when mammoth document processing apps 
are discussed/described.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "vashaun jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by 
theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: does the Mac have a word processor? what about Mail?


The defense rest its case because of an inability to prove that there
is a difference between text editors and word processors. I wonder why
they are called two different things and more often than not word
processors have more functionality and produce a better type set and
formatted outlay. I believe in the right tool for the job and in most
cases a document in the business world can't be created and structured
using note pad or Text Edit.
On Apr 25, 2008, at 4:08 PM, David Poehlman wrote:

> I'd tell them that wordpad is built-in and that it has limitted word
> processing capabilities but text edit is more than word pad.
>
> What about Mail Shaun?  you can do all kinds of things in Mail.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "vashaun jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS
> X by
> theblind" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 4:05 PM
> Subject: Re: does the Mac have a word processor? what about Mail?
>
>
> David I can type text just about anywhere in Leopard that doesn't make
> it word processing. Data entry maybe but not word processing. If
> someone asked you if you could do word processing on a Windows box I
> am sure you wouldn't tell them that Notepad was their guy, would you?
> On Apr 25, 2008, at 3:43 PM, David Poehlman wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> We do wordprocessing on the Mac more than we think.  I know people
>> who use
>> mail to compose all their documents.
>>
>> -- 
>> Jonnie Appleseed
>> With His
>> Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
>> Reducing Technologies disabilities
>> one byte at a time
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>





Reply via email to