My only problem with fusion is that if you put JAWS on there, the
architecture thinks that there are new hardware changes and it loses its
activation.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Grady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by
theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 11:09 PM
Subject: Re: Fusion Versus Bootcamp
On Apr 30, 2008, at 11:16 PM, Tiffany D wrote:
or whatever os you're using. Which is better? If I were to use
Fusion, would I literally have to install Windows every time?
No.
highly doubt I could access files stored in Leopared using Fusion
because it's virtual, but I heard this is true with Bootcamp as well.
You are wrong in the case of Fusion, Since I don't use Bootcamp I
couldn't say anything about that except that Fusion requires a lot more
memory to run if that would be a concern to you.
But I've also heard of something called Parallel, which enables you to
use both systems symultaniously and drag and drop from one to the
other. How accessible is that?
If you need to run Windows and Mack software at the same time then as far
as I know Fusion is the only accessible option.
Thanks,
Tiffanitsa
