Greg,
Looks good, but I have one suggestion that I believe is very important
From reading the page you linked, it sounds like a program must meet
*all* accessibility to be able to display the Mac accessibility logo.
In some cases this may be impractical or impossible. I suggest at
least three separate variations...one for complete accessibility, one
for VI accessibility, one for hearing-impaired accessibility.
An example of why...
I'm not going to try to come up with an example specific to Mac, but a
more generalized one. A Braille'n'Speak, one of the notetakers for
the blind, cannot practically be made accessible to the deaf. Photo
editing software would be totally accessible to someone who is deaf,
but virtually impossible to be made fully accessible to someone who is
blind. And so on...
Lumping everything into a single logo I think is too restrictive and
will hamper the cause.
JMHO.
Josh de Lioncourt
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Lioncourt
Mac-cessibility Site: http://www.Lioncourt.com
...my other mail provider is an owl...
On 1 May, 2008, at 11:27 AM, Greg Kearney wrote:
Would you folks take a look at this and tell me what you think?
Mac Accessible Logo Program is a CUCAT program to insure that your
Macintosh applications and hardware products are meeting a high
level of accessibility standards for use by the blind, deaf, print
disabled and others with similar conditions. Products passing our
reviews will be permitted to display the Mac Accessible logo on
their packaging, advertisements and web sites.
http://www.cucat.org/consulting/macaccessible/
Greg Kearney
535 S. Jackson St.
Casper, Wyoming 82601
307-224-4022
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
