At www.annualcreditreport.com, they have a different version of the
technique described below.  You are given a six-digit number and a
toll-free number to call.  You enter the six-digit number and they give
you a different six-digit to enter on the web site.  I thought it was
pretty slick and a method like this should be encouraged for other web
sites.

Dan



On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:58:49 -0400 Chris Blouch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, it's a hard problem. I was talking with some folks about 
> alternative accessible solutions to Captcha and one possibility was 
> to 
> have the ability to enter a phone number and then have them call you 
> 
> with an automated series of letters/numbers read on the phone which 
> you 
> would type into the web page. This has some of the same benefits of 
> cost 
> to the hacker and can be rate limited to prevent repeated attacks. 
> As 
> you say, it also requires some trust and good privacy policy that 
> they 
> won't be using your number for anything else. Of course I also 
> pointed 
> out that any school kid would love this service as a prank to ring 
> up 
> somebody's house at the wee hours of the morning via any web 
> browser. I 
> think this issue pretty much put an end to that solution.
> 
> CB
> 
> Jacob Schmude wrote:
> > The problem with that is the issue of privacy. I'd prefer not to 
> allow 
> > any old forum moderator to have my phone number, for example. Even 
> 
> > getting past that, phone numbers can be faked, and I'd imagine the 
> 
> > phone system would have to be automated, which means that once the 
> 
> > counter-response is figured out it could be cracked rather easily. 
> On 
> > top of that, what if the web site in question isn't in your 
> country of 
> > residence? Some of those international rates can get nasty, at 
> least 
> > in the U.S.
> > This is a problem with no easy solution, unfortunately, though I 
> > personally believe that questions structured in an odd way that 
> the 
> > human brain could figure out is the best compromise. It has its 
> > problems, such as needing to be familiar with the language in 
> > question, but at the same time I believe it to resolve most of the 
> 
> > other problems. Let's face it, no matter what security measure 
> anyone 
> > comes up with there will always be someone to break it. And the 
> ones 
> > trying to make things secure wind up playing catch-up as their 
> > security measures are broken. The question in my mind is how much 
> > security will the end users tolerate? Hopefully it's a question we 
> 
> > won't ever have to actually see answered.
> >
> > On Jun 20, 2008, at 9:25, Chris Blouch wrote:
> >
> >> This is another example of how to avoid hackers getting in. Add 
> some 
> >> real expense and traceable communications to the authentication 
> >> process. A hacker doesn't care if they have to try 10000 times to 
> 
> >> crack one captcha since they are doing though some botnet. The 
> >> bandwidth and compute power are essentially free and they can 
> hide 
> >> behind a shield of relative anonymity. If they have to make a 
> phone 
> >> call that raises the bar. For one that call is traceable so if 
> >> something funny happens it comes back to a phone number under 
> >> somebody's name. It also has a real cost as the phone line or 
> cell 
> >> phone account costs real money and they can't automate it so some 
> 
> >> real human will have to make the call. The 10000 tries now isn't 
> such 
> >> a great deal.
> >>
> >> CB
> >>
> >> Dan Eickmeier wrote:
> >>> And that is good for those who are on cell phone providers that 
> >>> support that verrification.  Mine didn't, and I had to email 
> their 
> >>> support to get it fixed.
> >>>
> >>> On 19-Jun-08, at 12:21 AM, Chelsea wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Well, that is good for those who have talking cell phones. :(
> >>>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 9:17 PM, John Moore wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> They should do it like Facebook, where they  take the Captcha 
> away 
> >>>>> when you varify your cell phone number with a code they send 
> you 
> >>>>> via text message. When you type the code in right, Captcha 
> becomes 
> >>>>> nonexistent.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> 

____________________________________________________________
Find solutions for your business. Click here and get it done now!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3m7tEC4dGrQ9pkvxDgoFpg1CMdsWcGTyUgdHOaD9biq7lkRz/

Reply via email to