I don't have tiger but seem to remember that ftp did not normally allow 
access to the entire system.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Gilland Desktop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS Xby 
theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: ftp server issues still not resolved


so, how do I check the read write status, I tried going to get info and
looking in there but that dialog didn't make much sinse to me.

Chris.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Poehlman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS Xby
theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: ftp server issues still not resolved


> some things to do/check.  if you are logged into an admin account, use a
> non
> admin account and boot into it.  Check the readwrite status on your drive
> and folders.  if it is set to everyone can read and write, ftp will leave
> you wide open.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Chris Gilland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 12:52 AM
> Subject: ftp server issues still not resolved
>
>
> I'm still having the same issue with my ftp server built into the o s.
> When
> users try logging in, and btw, they are not! administrators, they see
> their
> entire home dir sure, but, they see more than that so... everything.  I
> mean, they are getting read/write to the root.  they could practicly wipe
> the whole system, not just my Tiger volume, but all of them, being they
> can
> get to the volumes folder.  Heck, they can see /dev, /etc/ all of that is
> there.
>
> why in the heavens is this.  I thought if they logged in with their
> account
> details, they'd be taken into their homedir and no further up.
> I understand I may not be getting many responses on this as no one really
> knows, but can someone at least try to help me?  I'd rather get possibly
> far
> fetched answers, than to get none as it seems I am.
>
> Chris.
>
>
>
>
>





Reply via email to