oh dam, that, would, suck!
On Jul 25, 2008, at 4:33 AM, David Poehlman wrote:

actually, it's a cascade and if enough of it is brought down, the rest can
fall.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike's Western Account" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by
theblind" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: what do you think?


the internet is quite broad, yeah parts of your information might go
down for a little bit, but the likelyhood of the entire internet going
down is nill to none
On Jul 24, 2008, at 1:48 PM, James Austin wrote:

Thanks for the clarification Chris,

But surely all of this assumes that the internet is forever and is
constant. What if, one day, the whole WWW was suddenly to disappear,
clients like these would be obsolete immediately. At least until the
internet could be brought back up.

Just my thoughts

With warmest wishes

James


On 24 Jul 2008, at 22:29, Chris Blouch wrote:

Not sure if this is what he is referring to:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing

but the general idea is to have thinner clients with less storage
and instead beef up the communications so we can keep all our stuff
"on the internet" somewhere. Sort of what mobileMe is starting to
do. It eliminates the need to sync different devices, backup files
or having collections of bits in different piles. The idea has been
around for a while but the internet infrastructure was initially
too slow to be usable and then it wasn't wireless. We're right on
the edge of a new thing with fast wireless. Do I really care if my
files are not on my device as long as I can get to them anytime
from anywhere? This is what's pushing new devices like the cherry
pal.

http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/08/07/22/1735222.shtml

Extending that you could have a dumb box with no OS or apps or
documents and store all that in the cloud. The box would have just
enough software to get its network up and download everything. No
more getting updates and installing them since it would always have
the latest version when it downloads the bootup code. Novell used
to do something like this back in the day with diskless PCs and
special network cards.

CB

UCLA Bruins Fan wrote:
Who exactly is this Scott guy anyways? Why should we be concerned
about his speculations?
Just curious; he just seems like a blogger to me.  What is all
this cloud business he's talking about?
Olivia

On Jul 24, 2008, at 7:18 AM, James Austin wrote:

Hi folks,

How do I leave a comment on this article? Sorry for asking what
is probably a really obvious question, but I have not yet found
where this is. Although I have read the comments that were make
by some on this list.

Is there any way we could get in touch with  Apple directly to
pass along our concerns. I mean it is very likely that Apple have
people who search for Apple related publicity and such on the
web, but it is also just as likely that they miss a lot as the
internet is such as vast place.

Just my thoughts
Thank you

With warmest wishes

James


MSN - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Skype - saulky1984

On 24 Jul 2008, at 05:11, Janet and Felix * wrote:


I read your comments.  Very well spoken.  Scott didn't have much
of a comment back though.  I thought he was just patronizing.
But the seed is planted.  The idea was put out there.

Janet

----------------------------------------
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: what do you think?
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:58:05 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I sure hope it doesn't go backwards. Apple is just getting good!
On Jul 23, 2008, at 7:34 PM, Mike's Western Account wrote:

i did as well. and this does have something to do with vo,
what do
you all think will happen with vo?
On Jul 23, 2008, at 5:31 PM, Tiffany D wrote:

I made a reply over there stating that I'd found the post
here and
expressing my concerns.  This is definitely something that we
all
need
to watch very closely.  It doesn't sound good at all, and I,
for one,
would hate to see Apple go backward, especially considering
how far
they've come with relation to accessibility.

On 7/23/08, Mike's Western Account  wrote:
so this makes someone wonder what will happen to vo, If this
is the
direction that apple goes It makes you think for sure that
if this
is
where it goes and apple does choose to keep voiceover
included, then
there would be access to the iphone. Anyways just
speckulation, but
check it out:
http://weblogs.redeyechicago.com/iphoneblog/2008/07/its-the-cloud-s.html








_________________________________________________________________
Keep your kids safer online with Windows Live Family Safety.
http://www.windowslive.com/family_safety/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_family_safety_072008














Reply via email to