Hi Jacob,

I don't use the folder treeviews in Windows explorer so I'll take your word
for it on that one.  But in finder there's no easy way to cut and paste, no
real way to see your folders first and files last or the other way round
meaning files first and then folders last.  No really easy way to run a
program with a hotkey, instead you have to navigate to an edit field then
interact then type in your program you want to run etc.  I grant it that
Quick look is sort've handy I guess but more time than not it's a pain in
the arse and I turn it off.  But I praise finder for having that hotkey to
turn it off and on.  Windows explorer has this and more plus it's list view
is excellent.  I don't worry about column view and wouldn't use it on the
mac if the mac's list view was half way decent.  But each to their own as
they say.  That's why I like disk order instead of finder.

David Truong

EMail and Messenger:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Skype:  blindboxer1967

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jacob Schmude
Sent: Wednesday, 10 December 2008 1:07 AM
To: General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by
theblind
Subject: Re: Finder problems. Pleaze help!

Don't know if I'd agree with that, I do like quite a bit about the  
finder actually. Like everything, I guess, it's got its quirks though  
and certain things about it could certainly use an update. Column view  
in and of itself makes the finder far from a joke for me, I'd love to  
see something like that in other file managers. Windows explorer sort  
of has this, but it's a folder-only treeview and you have to tab back  
and fourth between it and the file list, and that to me is a joke. I  
also think quicklook is very useful, and I like its uncluttered  
interface.
That being said, I hate the fact that it switches back to icon view  
sometimes. I hate those dot files it creates in remote folders  
(the .DS_Store files can be disabled, but that doesn't help some of  
the others it creates). I know what they're for, but it doesn't make  
them any less annoying. Its built-in FTP is a crack-up as well, no  
upload support? What were they thinking.
I think it's mostly a matter of taste. I like the minimal approach  
Finder takes--it's a file manager, and that's all it tries to be. But  
sometimes I feel like getting ahold of some of the engineers who  
designed Finder and beating their heads against a wall :). It's sort  
of a love/hate thing, I guess.

On Dec 9, 2008, at 08:48, David Truong wrote:

> The Mac finder is a joke so I'm not surprised.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jacob Schmude
> Sent: Tuesday, 9 December 2008 10:07 PM
> To: General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS  
> X by
> theblind
> Subject: Re: Finder problems. Pleaze help!
>
> Well, Vista does anyway. XP actually handles this very well once
> configured properly, it opens all folders in your selected view. This
> is what Ars's rant claims Finder does, but on mine it most certainly
> doesn't, and that's the problem. I want it to remember to open
> everything, and I mean everything, in column view, but disk images
> insist on going back to icon mode. At least OS X has a shortcut to
> switch the views quickly, unlike Windows, and hitting command+3 when a
> disk image opens has pretty much become an automatic habbit I don't
> even think about.
>
>
>
> On Dec 9, 2008, at 07:00, David Poehlman wrote:
>
>> You should see the mess windows makes of this.
>>
>>
>
>    The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a
> thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot
> possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to
> get at or repair.
>       --Douglas Adams
>
>
>

    The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a  
thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot  
possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to  
get at or repair.
        --Douglas Adams



Reply via email to