Hey Fonzie
The accessibility of Virtualbox 2.1.0 is about the same as 2.0.6 was. Not surprising, as Virtualbox uses QT for its interface, so improved accessibility is dependent on QT's accessibility itself being improved. To use sliders, use the tab key to get to the slider and use the standard arrow keys. The percentage won't be announced, however you can tab to the text field right after the slider to read the value, then tab back to adjust it some more. Not optimal, but doable. This is due to a bug in QT's accessibility at the moment. Some of the lists aren't accessible, they're just reported as "unknown." Fortunately, everything in Virtualbox can also be done through the command-line, so for those few aspects that just aren't accessible enough in the GUI there is a way to set these options. Whether it will give Fusion a run for its money depends on what you are doing with it. If you don't need hardware acceleration (a.k.a 3d DirectX Video in Windows) it actually performs much faster than fusion in most cases and with less resource usage. Additionally, it's configuration options are much more advanced than Fusions, the downside however is that you're expected to know what the options do, and if you're unfamiliar with some of the more technical aspects of virtualization some of these can be a bit daunting at first. Additionally, there are no "easy install" wizards as there are in Fusion. All operating systems have to be installed manually through their standard setup procedures, i.e. for Windows you'd need an unattended installation cd prepared. Once set up however I find it performs very well, in most cases much better than Fusion. However, as you noted, certain hardware accelerations aren't as good, this particularly affects DirectX gaming. My advice, for those who are wondering which one to use, is to try them both out and see which fits your situation the best.



On Dec 24, 2008, at 06:52, Fonzie wrote:

Hey all, how is it going?

Whoah, it's super early here in texas, and I am up looking up news? Oh well eh?

Anyhow, back to what I wanted to posted about.

I noticed that on December 17, Virtual Box 2.1.0 was released.

Has anyone tried it out with VoiceOver? I know several of you keep track of virtualization software, so thought I would post it out there to see what you guys thought.

Currently using Fusion myself. Perhaps Virtual Box 2.1.0 would give VMWare Fusion a run for it's money? Only time will tell, and maybe in later versions this could happen.

Take care all.

Best,

Fonzie


The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at or repair.
        --Douglas Adams


Reply via email to