To: General discussions on all topics relating to the use of Mac OS X by the blind <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Virtual Box 2.1.0 Message-ID: <20081225172026.ga2...@moped> References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Organization: SSB BART Group
Possibly naive question: Other than the cost of buying both packages, is there any reason not to use Fusion to set up a new VM and then use Virtual Box to run it more efficiently? On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 03:54:03AM -0800, Alex Jurgensen wrote: Hi, I'll try it at the first opertunity. Thanks for listening, Alex, On 24-Dec-08, at 3:52 AM, Fonzie wrote: >Hey all, how is it going? > >Whoah, it's super early here in texas, and I am up looking up news? >Oh well eh? > >Anyhow, back to what I wanted to posted about. > >I noticed that on December 17, Virtual Box 2.1.0 was released. > >Has anyone tried it out with VoiceOver? I know several of you keep >track of virtualization software, so thought I would post it out >there to see what you guys thought. > >Currently using Fusion myself. Perhaps Virtual Box 2.1.0 would give >VMWare Fusion a run for it's money? Only time will tell, and maybe >in later versions this could happen. > >Take care all. > >Best, > >Fonzie > --
