Simon Brouwer wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I read a story on Slashdot about Microsoft further opening up the license
> to the MSO 2003 XML Reference Schemas.
> 
> It seems that the license is compatible with "many open source licenses",
> Microsoft even provides a link to the OSI.
> However, the license requires " (...) that the patent and copyright
> provisions in the license for the Office 2003 XML Reference Schemas
> require you to include a notice of attribution in your program." which
> appears to make it incompatible with (L)GPL.

I'm not so sure GPL compatability is an issue - isn't GPL compatability only
required for code that you link to? An XSLT file used for importing is
hardly code, and certainly doesn't need a linker.

I'm not even sure if such an XSLT file would be disqualified from a GPL
licenced disto, since XSLT it's akin to a very elaborate CSS + script.
AFAIK There is no requirement for such files to be free.

This is a matter of definitions I suppose. I sometimes say "I only use free
software", but I probably visit sites and run non-free javascript (albeit
in a free javascript engine) every day. There is certainly no requirement
in the GPL that you can't have a free engine that runs non-free scripts.
XSLT is very much like a script.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to