Hi Rick, and Welcome!  

You have raised some really deep issues, and so you should probably 
know that there is a history of conversations around this kind of 
topic that you will enjoy coming up to speed on.  I hope that my 
reply will clearly give you my personal opinion, as well as offer 
some helpful background info.  

On Thursday 03 February 2005 18:12, Rick Owen wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've just joined the list. If I'm posting to the wrong list

No problem, this is the correct list.

> If this turns out to be one of
> those flame inducing topics like asking "how can anyone use that
> piece of crap editor xxxx?" on comp.editors then please know that
> I do it in ignorance.

No, my troll-guard slept through your entire email.  (heh). 

> Several times, however, I''ve installed OO on
> colleagues' computers only to have them call me in a panic when
> they save a document, edit it some more, and then get this
> message when they attempt to save it again:

snip....

> The message itself is enough to discourage a potential Office
> user for switching 

Your email brings up several very deep points which bear much 
discussion.  I will try to summarize my personal opinion:  

1)  OpenOffice.org (OOo) is a disruptive technology (as Harvard biz 
prof Clayton Christensen uses that term) which caters to a 
different set of "customers" than Microsoft Office's best customers 
(please see link below for more on Christensen);

2)  OOo's best customers are "overshot" customers who are not 
willing to pay a premium for the extra features of Microsoft Office 
AND nonconsumers who simply can't afford or illegally copy 
Microsoft Office;

3)  OOo is exploding in countries like Brazil and Spain, where there 
are lots of overshot customers and non-consumers;

4) The office productivity suite is a commodity, and the business 
model for creation and distribution of the office suite is about to 
flip from functionality (Microsoft) to reliability then convenience 
and finally price;

5) Businesses which derive their incomes from the sale of the office 
productivity suite will increasingly face declining revenues, as 
the commoditization wave rolls ashore.  

I have written way too many similar emails here on this subject, and 
so to avoid being strangled by our fellow list mates, I will just 
say that you might wanna read some of these links, because there 
are lots of commonly-held values here at OOo that you will find out 
about by reading these links.  Of course, since this is an open 
source project, these values will constantly change, and your 
opinions are valuable.  Still, reading these links will bring you 
up to speed:

Our marketing page has lots of good info, especially our Strategic 
Marketing Plan, which forms kinda more or less the thoughts of our 
team as to the general direction that the marketing of this project 
should be heading:

http://marketing.openoffice.org/strategy/

Here is the general marketing page:

http://marketing.openoffice.org/

I think that open source is such a big deal and so different in the 
course of human history from anything that has gone before, I am 
heading up a community project to make a film about open source, 
called "The Digital Tipping Point".  You can read about it here:

http://www.digitaltippingpoint.com/content/view/46/60/

> If it sounds like I'm on a soapbox, I am.  OpenOffice is good.
> Not good; great!  I want it to succeed in a big way! However, I
> know from personal experience that people are resitant to change
> and as soon as that message pops up (especially for someone
> sticking their neck out a bit), they'll just scrap it.

There is a really smart guy in Boston by the name of Bhaskar 
Chakravorti who wrote a book called "The Slow Pace of Fast Change", 
which is linked below.  We interviewed him for the Digital Tipping 
Point film.  Basically, Dr. Chak breaks this whole migration 
process down into its elemental pieces in his book.  As I said, 
your question raises some really deep issues, and to even touch on 
all of the very profound issues that your email raises wil take 
weeks and weeks of discussion and weeks and weeks of reading books; 
OR, you can just wait until September, 2005, when our movie comes 
out and will explain it all to you.  Heh.  

Seriously, though, we have talked lots and lots about this subject, 
and I have written lots and lots about Dr. Chak and Dr. 
Christensen, and that's just me, and there are many, many more 
people on this list who have written more clearly and more 
intelligently than I on this topic.  If you want to get just a 
thumbnail sketch of what we have discussed here about this topic, 
try googling Einfeldt Chakravorti Christensen disruptive and then 
step back from your monitor cause it's gonna explode. 

Here is Dr. Chak's link:

http://www.slowpacefastchange.com

Here is Christensen's link:

http://www.claytonchristensen.com

and his biz gig on selling books on disruption theory:

http://www.innosight.com

Again, Welcome!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to