mp wrote: > word count is better, but why such a small step for what must be a > simple feature?
If you consider the feature to be simple, please feel free to submit a patch. I will gladly take a look at it on IZ. Did you previously submit an issue with your request? Could I see the issue number? Certainly you don't expect that we'll just know what you want without submitting an issue. If you show me the issue you submitted we can compare it with other issues that were dealt with and see which ones were most requested. I think you will find that OOo 2.0, for the most part, did a fair job at keeping a balance between user want and technical feasibility. > must say i am disappointed, I am usually disappointed with users who don't seem to realize how hard we work to make OOo the best office suite in the world. It can be disheartening to pour your soul into a project, only to have people respond by ignoring most of the things you did well, focus on one you didn't do, which apparently was not highly requested before, and then say "I am disappointed". I'm sure this is hard for a lot of us. Cheers, -- Daniel Carrera | I don't want it perfect, Join OOoAuthors today! | I want it Tuesday. http://oooauthors.org | --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
