Eugene Wong wrote: > Actually, I'm not sure that I agree with that. I tried to form the > Sets Project. It was called something else eventually, if I recall > correctly. In the project we were supposed to create various types of > download files, but it was really hard to find space to store these > files, plus I didn't feel that I was getting much co-operation from > OOo. Even if I made a better download file, they still were offering > the inefficient files.
I agree with that sentiment. OOo is very resistant to new volunteers. I have met much of that resistance myself. > I remember when I hit the last road block, I was deliberately told to > wait for 2.0. May I ask what that road block was? Would you still be willing to try the Sets project? I think that it would be valuable, especially now that OOo is switching to native installers. I can't promise to work much on the project, but I'll try to help. Cheers, -- Daniel Carrera | I don't want it perfect, Join OOoAuthors today! | I want it Tuesday. http://oooauthors.org | --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
