On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 22:22, M. Fioretti wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 15:04:52 PM -0500, Daniel Carrera > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 11:58:50AM -0800, Eugene Wong wrote: > > > > > Please follow standard netiquette. If you're too busy to follow > > > standard netiquette, then I'm too busy to read your email. > > > > If I had been particularly keen on getting lots of readers for my > > email, I would have changed the thread. As it was, I was just > > responding to Ian really. :-) > > If that was a private, one to one exchange, it should not have crowded > the list. However, it wasn't. I was referring to several people, not > just you and Ian. Witness the messages that keep coming under this > subject by Andrew, Joerg, and earlier by Jacqueline. *Everybody* > discussing why there isn't enough involvement with the website... in a > place, that is under a subject, where many wouldn't come to listen. > > The irritating part (again, nothing against you *personally*) is that > this happens all the times on all the lists... and, almost always, > from the most expert members.
Ok, apologies. You are right. The difficulty is that topics drift and its not clear that its going to develop beyond one or two comments until the new topic has developed a life of its own and then no-one takes responsibility because no-one can remember exactly who it was that started the change. We all need to try harder! -- Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ZMS Ltd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
