(I thought this thread was dead)I don't think that there is something wrong "in the process of designing specs". IMHO there are some errors made in some of the specs. Consider the *huge* amount we made for OOo2.0 - it's not surprising that some of them are not, well, satisfying. We learned from that for the future: we will create less specifications and let more people review them.
Please remember: only people that don't do anything don't make errors.
I understand that doings things have the risk to make a mistake from time to time. I make errors many more times than I would like. I am not blaming anyone. Just pointing out from outside point of view (with perhaps a different bias) some minor defects. That errors are expected is a big project is a different thing to not complaining about them because they are expectd.
I see this whole discussion as a very very positive landmark. It started as consideration about the number of votes needed to change a design decision. As already indicated, the system works: community asked changes are here!. I consider that this thread shows up perfectly the FOSS model advantages. I am very grateful.
And I cannot agree more with the conclusion you draw: more people review. Thanks a lot!
- Enrique -
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
