I voted for this one. Chad, get on over there!
And while you guys are looking at issues, could somebody else see if 
my issue, http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=46035 is 
confirmable? It may be a "Windows only" issue. I can't get m80, so it 
may be fixed. But if it's not resolved for 2.0, it's a true show 
stopper for me. :-(
-Greg

Date sent:              Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:21:47 -0500
From:                   James Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:                     [email protected]
Subject:                Re: [discuss]  Re: Re: No more file association to MSO 
when installing

> Michael A Chase wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:01:26 -0500, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>I will vote for it too. I will also 'cofirm' the issue, so that it goes
> >>to the developers directly. And I'll track it. But having me tracking it
> >>doesn't really mean much. It just means you have a friend trying to
> >>help.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >I prefer the wording proposed by Matt Needles in August 2004. I've filed
> >an issue by borrowing the wording I put into 4414 last August.  I don't
> >do Windows, so I haven't seen the dialog myself.
> >
> >Issue 46347: Clearer Explaination Needed in the File Associations Dialog
> >=====
> >The most frequent complaint seen on the users' lists is "Help! Your
> >program has taken over my computer!"  Either the description needs to be
> >made more clear, or making OOo the default for MSO file types should be
> >defered until runtime.
> >
> >Suggested wording from Matt Needles in August 2004: "OpenOffice.org can
> >open MS Word, Excel and PowerPoint documents.  Another program is
> >currently assigned this task on your system.  Do you want OpenOffice.org
> >to be the default program to open these files when you open them from
> >Windows Explorer?  If you choose NO, you may still open these files from
> >within OpenOffice.org."
> >=====
> >
> >I encourage anyone who is interested to add comments and vote early and
> >often.
> >
> >  
> >
> I did not see this when I checked for it again, so there is a second 
> issue # for this now,  46397.  can someone (who knows how to, since I 
> don't fix it so that there is not 2 issues for the same thing.) sorry.  
> should have kept reading before filing.
> 
> 
> James Walker
> 
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to