On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:48, bealach wrote: > Daniel Carrera wrote: > > bealach wrote: > >>I was only reporting what PC World said, wasn't I? > > > > Yes. The point I was trying to make is that we can't fix it if we don't > > know what the problem is. > > PCWorld was totally unspecific about Ooo db, neither did they say why > Access was not very good (but M$ software isn't good anyway). I have not > tried OOo2 so I wouldn't know.
Judging from comments I have heard from various PC techies, MS Access's problem is that it is only good for small databases, and falls over once you try anything above a certain size. Since OO.org connects to _serious_ databases of all shapes and sizes, I don't see that as being a problem with OO.org. > > Regards, > > bealach > Wesley Parish -- Clinersterton beademung, with all of love - RIP James Blish ----- Mau e ki, he aha te mea nui? You ask, what is the most important thing? Maku e ki, he tangata, he tangata, he tangata. I reply, it is people, it is people, it is people. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
