Ah, alright. Got it.

Well... you have a point. We could require people to submit the addons "under the same license as OOo itself". I think many people would be receptive to that. It sounds reasonable, and it sounds Perl-ish. :-)

Cheers,
Daniel.

Joerg Barfurth wrote:
Hi Daniel,

Daniel Carrera wrote:

OTOH if you insist on using a license that prevents Sun from using your contribution in OOo, then that shows a very asymmetric attitude:



That's a separate issue now. Let's not confuse (1) giving your copyright to Sun with (2) a particular choice of license.



I was replying to your:

And you do this with the full knowledge that it will be released
under a license that permits propietary derivatives, and that if Sun
likes your work, they can include it into StarOffice but leave OOo
out of it.


Ciao, J�rg


-- Senior Representative Digital Distribution Global Training Services Pty. Ltd. Premier OpenOffice.org and StarOffice Online Training providers http://www.digitaldistribution.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to