Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
John W. Kennedy a Ãcrit :

Gary Edwards wrote:


And what do they do with OpenDocument?  They mark it acceptable as an
open standard "pending" ratification by OASIS.


Why is OpenDocument the only file format in the Commonwealth's list
that requires ratification by an Open Standards Group?   Yeah.  You
got it.  It's a set up.  And Open Source is the target.


Ummm....  I'm no expert on the day-to-day politics of Open Source, but
it seems to me they have the rather obvious justification that until
OASIS (or somebody, but OASIS is the one at bat now) ratifies
OpenDocument, it isn't any sort of standard in the first place.

Sometimes a "pending" is just a "pending".


But then neither are the other proposed formats, except they somehow
don't have to pass the same test to be considered "standards"

Yes, but at least the Microsoft standards are Microsoft standards. OpenDocument, until OASIS acts, isn't /anybody's/ standard -- not even OOo's, since OOo 2.0 is in beta.


--
John W. Kennedy
Read the remains of Shakespeare's lost play, now annotated!
http://pws.prserv.net/jwkennedy/Double%20Falshood/index.html


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to