Johan Vromans wrote: > Ken Foskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 10:15 +0200, Johan Vromans wrote: >> >>> So the question remains: will OOo be released 'built correctly' (not >>> requiring _any_ Java), in multiple forms (with/without Java), or just >>> with Java leaving the 'built correctly' version as an exercise to the >>> community? >> >> I believe that the question is moot. The packagers for your brand Linux >> will provide a package that works, this is enough for 90% of our users. > > Sigh. It seems to be very hard to get a simple answer to a simple > question. > > For the time being I'll assume that OOo 2 will require Java.
You always needed Java to build OOo *completely*. That didn't change with OOo2.0. Best regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
