Jonathon Blake wrote: > Mathias wrote: > >> You should explain that. OOo2.0 supports Bidi in the same way as OOo1.1 > > Except OOo 1.1.2 has better support for Semitic languages than the > current OOo 1.9.x
This statement is still too general to allow a useful answer. If you found specific problems in 1.9.x you should name them. Then it is possible to find out if it is a bug or what else might be the root cause. To my knowledge the Bidi support in OOo1.9.x shouldn't be worse than in 1.x. >> and none of the versions supported switching languages (if you mean the GUI >> language). > > So what is changing, if not the language of the GUI, in the > Thai/English or Russian/Hebrew/English versions of OOo. Or in OOo > 1.1.3 ZA? Those are obviously special builds done by whomever, so it is useless to compare them with the "official" builds. I'm sure once 2.0 will be out people will be able to provide the same kind of builds for it. BTW: I already saw Multilanguage builds for the new version. OOo2.0 will support languages (especially language packs) even better than OOo1.x. So no reason to worry. :-) Best regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
