On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 19:45:26 PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Le mercredi 08 juin 2005 � 19:14 +0200, M. Fioretti a �crit :
>
> > define what could be a limited, more realistic goal (the
> > "javascript-like", in-document only macros), and list what one
> > should do, what to read, which lists to join etc... to give a hand
>
> The "limited" stuff is what XForms is about : a clearly delimited set of
> functionality, with a standard way of expressing it.
>
> Any proposal that's just let's use a langage (basic, python, javascript)
> without defining compliance profiles is just opening up the doors for
> incompatible implementations (because the core will be the same but the
> overlaps limited)
Please help me to understand it better: I read online that "XForms is
a platform independent markup language for data capture and
validation". Not necessarily data processing.
Do you mean that one should "only write these "macros" in Xforms
markup language" or that one should write them in $LANGUAGE but only
accessing/reading/writing/processing XForms elements?
All of this from within OO.o?
TIA,
Marco
--
Marco Fioretti mfioretti, at the server mclink.it
Fedora Core 3 for low memory http://www.rule-project.org/
... Work like you don't need money, love like you've never been hurt,
and dance like nobody is watching. Anonymous
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
