On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 11:31:35 AM -0500, Peter Kupfer OOo
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I think this is my last post because we are going in circles. I am going
> to make the following conclusions. If am wrong please let me know.
>
> 1) The overall issue seems to lie in the collabnet software that OOo
> uses for its mailing list.
>
Probably yes.
> 2) Everyone (save maybe Nicolas) agrees that unsubscribed posters should
> get a copy of the message.
I'm with Nicholas on this, but as long as list traffic is minimized...
> 4) Marco's solution (which if it works would be optimal) requires a
> someone to run a Linux machine with procmail on it.
>
> 5) No one thus far has stepped up to do that, so until a time when that
> is accomplished, the status quo will have to remain
Probably yes. The only missing part is that the request for
Linux/procmail volunteers should be put somewhere on the website where
potential candidates can easily see it, without me or others having to
post it in full every other month.
> Other solutions:
>
> 1) Make discuss subscriber only.
Yes, +1 to that, it would be better.
Ciao,
Marco
--
Marco Fioretti mfioretti, at the server mclink.it
Fedora Core 3 for low memory http://www.rule-project.org/
The biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it has occurred
read on Slashdot
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
