Standards are there for information exchange. Therefore, good practice requires that there are (at least) two independent implementations of the standard.

(This is what is severely missing with the OpenDoc (OOo2) standard.)

That's what I mean, we've got, what? Two office suites using OpenDocument? And really, neither one is using them for real yet. OOo
2.0 (that great mythilogical beast) *will* use it, but KOffice
doesn't yet, and OOo doesn't yet.

Eh??

We've been using OOo2 exclusively in our office with essentially ZERO problems for the last 6 months, so don't know where that 'mythological beast' comment came from. The dev builds of OOo2 have been *much* more stable than *any* of the OOo1 builds ever were, at least in our small office of 40 users, and with much less file format compatability issues to boot.

And when they do, what is that - maybe 10% of the market share (which
I highly doubt, but that number was quoted to me eariler). But that just means 10% of the market share will have access to it - not
actually use it in everyday life.

I'm just curious... isn't it possible to create third party add-on file filters for Microsoft Office products?

Why not simply create an OASIS file filter for Microsoft Office that anyone can d/l and install with just a few clicks of a button? Then, to get *FULL* file format interoperability, all a MSO user has to do is install the filter.

Such a filter should be an *official* add-on written and/or approved of by the OOo devs, for respectability purposes.

Maybe such a thing is impossible, but I don't really see how it could be any more difficult than reverse engineering the MSO fornmats themselves...

--

Charles

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to