On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 23:17 -0500, Chad Smith wrote: > > How about we say "ok - there's a problem here, we should work on > getting OOo to be less piggy with the system resources"?
I can get OOo to run acceptably on an Athlon 500 with 384M RAM (with 256M it was occasionally a bit slow especially if I had other applications up). I don't think the resource use is a problem, but if future versions are more efficient I won't mind. I would think most computers still in use now have at least 512M, if not much more, RAM; am I wrong on this? -- Shawn K. Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
