Wednesday, November 2, 2005 M. Fioretti wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 10:56:46 AM +0100, Giuseppe Bilotta > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> I don't know how much of the problem is intrinsic in the fileformat >> itself, and how much of it is nonoptimal coding in OOo. It would be >> interesting how other suites (e.g. KOffice, which I have to try >> sooner or later) fare on this file :) > Actually, the KOffice developers are already discussing this: > http://lists.kde.org/?t=113043237800002&r=1&w=2 VERY interesting read, Marco, thanks. Interesting that they mention Gnumeric (I didn't even know Gnumeric supported the OOo fileformats?) as being extremely fast. I have a strong suspicion that many of the problems they point out in *their* approach also affect OOo ... Maybe we could forward this thread to the Calc developers, or at least make them aware of it. -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
