On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 06:06:22 AM -0500, Lars D. Noodén
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I've run it with 128 MB on a 133 MHz PII, but that was under Debian
> and RedHat. It was slow, but acceptable for my parts. It was also
> OOo 1.1
Here, running 2.0 on 192 MB Ram and Fedora is still too slow. And I mean
slow *during* usage, not just to start up. This is an important point
that too often goes silenced by all the talks of how MS Office is
(pre) loaded faster, how OO.o start up can be improved on Linux etc...
> The MIT $100 Laptop will be very important. Whether OOo runs on it
> poorly, tolerably or quite well will make a big difference in the
> future of OOo. And probably StarOffice, too.
I agree. Especially if KOffice support for OpenDocument (performance
is already much better) keeps improving...
Ciao,
Marco
--
Marco Fioretti mfioretti, at the server mclink.it
Fedora Core 3 for low memory http://www.rule-project.org/
Life is what happens whilst you're busy making other plans
(John Lennon)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
