Konrad Stobiecki wrote: > Still, more real for me is the vision of a fixed (spelling) dictionary being > the base for teaching the word completion module. But I have got one more > idea, > maybe should worth checking - when I need for example a word "overwhelming" > the current version suppose lets me only choose "overwhelmed". So it is not > that bad, but still not the word I wanted. My idea is why not order the module > to swap the word every letter typed, for example: I type "ove" it shows > "overwhelms", > this word I don't want. So I type the next character "over" currently the > word completer wastes efforts, still showing "overwhelms". Why not force it > to change > the hinted word every letter written? And when I type "over" the not needed > "overwhelms" does not show, instead there is "overwhelmed", which I don't > need still > ,but maybe when I type "overw" it finally shows "overwhelming" and voila. > What do you think about it?
Sounds clever. :-) OTOH if you are a fast typer you might have overlooked the first autocomplettion though it might have been the right word. If you then hit the next key it's gone. I agree that AutoCompletion needs some polishing though IMHO it's not something I would see as a high priority. Other things (e.g. performance, stability, memory footprint) seem to be more important to me. Best regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
