Randomthots wrote:
I repeat, I am *not* making any ****ing assertion! I asked a question; a not unreasonable question. If the size of the file is 11 times bigger doesn't it make some sense that that would take longer to wade through?

You see, you just made an assertion :-) As for your question, it only makes sense if you don't have a technical background. Just like someone who has never programmed before might thing that using short variable names might be a good optimization. It really is very silly.

Now considering that whichever file is loaded, you end up with the same data structures in working memory,

Bzzzzz wrong. An OpenDocument spreadsheet has more and more complex data structures than a CSV file. This is where you show ignorance and lose the argument.

And it's not unreasonable to speculate that having a 45 MB file loaded into memory, when you don't have a lot of headroom to start with -- that's why I bought more RAM recently -- could knock you over the edge into vm swap. It's a speculation, not an assertion.

But when someone with more technical background than you tells you that this is unlikely to be a significant factor you resist their input with all your might.


This thread would have been a lot shorter if Daniel had said, "That might be an issue in marginal cases where you run short of RAM,

In other words, you'll only be satisfied if I tell you that you're right even though I'm confident you are not. Look, when you parse an XML tree and put it into RAM, you don't put the XML tags in plain text and re-copy them every time the tag appears. You use pointers to form a data structure that represents the information in the file. Constructing this data structure may be a complex operation (this is called "parsing XML") depending on the complexity of the document, but it is not dependent on the size of the XML tag.


Note that I haven't gotten enough information to actually make that statement and it may be completely wrong;

But you'd still like me to say it...

I give up; I guess I'll never find out.

You might try reading a book on XML and another on compexity theory.

Cheers,
Daniel.
--
     /\/`) http://oooauthors.org
    /\/_/  http://opendocumentfellowship.org
   /\/_/
   \/_/    I am not over-weight, I am under-tall.
   /

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to