Hi,
On 2005-12-22, at 11:45 , Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
Hello Ian,
On 2005-12-22, at 02:44 , Ian Laurenson wrote:
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 15:25 -0500, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
[snip]
These seem to me to be quite reasonable! In the meanwhile, if your
macros are not already prominently promoted, now is the time.
Ideally, of course, we could host the macros, but if licensing
is an
issue, then simply a link should seem a good start.
The macros are LGPL licensed so I don't think licensing is an
issue. I
have signed a JCA (I hope it was received as I got no
confirmation). So
I think the legal issues are covered.
Good; then let's post macros to the site. :-) We don't have a
Macros project as such but I'd be happy to consider creating it.
I think the extensions project should also host this kind of
extensions. Macros comes often as a complete library and deployed
as an UNO package. As far as i can remember we want collect and
provide this kind of extensions their.
extensions project = developing extensions, hosting extensisons, QA
for extensions or better classification of extensions, marrthem as
final, beta or whatever, ...
Okay, I defer to your wisdom. It's fine with me to host them there,
as long as we host macros and as long as endusers and contributors
are aware that we are hosting macros that they can actually use and
add to.
Cheers,
Louis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
