On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 19:45 +0000, Ian Lynch wrote: > On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 10:41 +0000, Jonathon Blake wrote: > > > That was _one_ of the reasons they were charged with anti-trust violations. > > xan > http://www.tbtf.com/resource/netscape-letter.html > > Letter listing alleged violations > > http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=3226 > > Microsoft's settlement. If they were not guilty why did they pay a 750m > settlement? > > Whatever the details, MS is a convicted monopolist and has settled other > suits out of court. Its really simple enough for a child to understand. > Our legal system is probabily not the most corrupt but its close. In America its sometimes cheaper to legally bribe the court than take a chance on a ruling against you. Its the same method the IRS used to force accountants to rat out their clients without any law forcing the change. So now smart rich people use Tax attorneys while the rest of us cower in fear.
Why did Michael jackson pay off his first child aquiser, because he thought it would be cheaper. Unfortunately for him it wrecked his career and he could not afford a second payoff. -- Carl Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
