> Thanks for your open mindedness and your understanding. No reason to introduce sarcams because I reject a proposal. Not every proposal can be the best solution. It's impossible You getting hit is a statistical conincidence.
>> If you did not fully understand my suggestion then I could have told you > that this is a macro which could be developed to provide the functionality > you are interested in and it could then be installed by any use, similar to > many other macros available today. I understood that you should create a macro. I didn't agree it was a simple and easy matter that everybody could apply. If it was as easy as you mention, it could be introduced by default and I sugges it is done by a field in the bar. Why not just admit my soulution IS the simplest?? Do you get offended by a rejected proposal not matter how inventive and clever it is? > If you did not fully understand my suggestion then I could have told you > that this is a macro which could be developed to provide the functionality > you are interested in and it could then be installed by any use, similar to > many other macros available today. So I utterly reject your rejection :) On 02-01-2006 15:12, CPHennessy wrote: > On Mon January 2 2006 13:50, + Henrik Eismark wrote: > > [ MODERATED ] *********************** > > > > >> It should be possible to do this using Starbasic macros today. > > > > Certainly not a viable solution and much worse than my simple suggestion > > of an input field in the top bar. Not userfriendly and much, much too > > complicated for the average and low competency user. And not enough of a > > competitive advantage for Openoffice.org. I utterly rejetc the proposed > > solution :-( > > Thanks for your open mindedness and your understanding. > If you did not fully understand my suggestion then I could have told you > that this is a macro which could be developed to provide the functionality > you are interested in and it could then be installed by any use, similar to > many other macros available today. So I utterly reject your rejection :) > > Please reply to [email protected] only. > > Normally [email protected] is the best list to ask questions about using > OpenOffice.org > > -- > CPH : OpenOffice.org contributor -- med venlig hilsen Henrik Eismark Ryetvej 19 st th 3500 Værløse Dagens visdom: Jo mere papir der bruges, jo mere skov plantes der. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
