i have unsubscribed, please take me off your email list
On 1/6/06, Edward Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rigel wrote:
> > Daniel, has pointed out, as I understand it, that 90% of the office
> > suite sits on a data processing component that allows the application
> > to do its work. The other 10% is skin's for the applications buttons
> > and windows, as well as some exporting functionality. It is this
> > integration that allows for the transfer of images to text documents,
> > to spreadhseets, to the presentation.
>
> I think trying to modify the existing code base to run a lite version of
> OOo, especially one designed to run on embedded devices, is the wrong
> approach.  It's like taking a satellite designed to run in space and
> patching it to run under water.
>
> A more realistic approach that applies to both embedded OOo AND an OOo
> viewer, is to start from scratch, with just the ODF specification, and
> work your way up from there, using the existing code base as a reference
> and nothing more.  Initially, you could just grab the text from the file
> and display it for a simple text view of the data.  Once that's done,
> you can add bits of formatting as is practical for the target platform.
>   Rather than starting with bloated code (bloated for the target
> platform, not in general), you start with something lite and add to it
> from there.
>
> Just because it's a different code base does not make it any less
> OpenOffice.org.  If the project is started here and has the backing of
> the OOo project, then it still qualified to be OOo (Lite or whatever the
> name/goals of the project are).
>
> Regards,
> Ed
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
JonaLynMooreKeeton

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to