On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 05:59 pm, Enno Rehling wrote: > Tim Fairchild wrote: > >> [1] The 32 bit builds. I am aware that the 64 bit builds are still a > >> work in progress, and didn't feel so experimental. > > > > A 32bit build of OOo2 or XP64 :) Worded a little funny there... > > Not to people who know what I'm talking about (32 bit build of XP64? What > should that be?)
Then the note really should have been beside OOo, not XP... And that's obvious anyway since OOo is known to be 32bit... 64bit XP is still a bit experimental anyway, right? > > Speaking of 64 bit, is there likely to be a 64bit OOo sometime? I have > > 32bit OOo2 on 64bit linux and it's not really an issue... But curious... > > There's apparently work being done on it, but it's going to take a while. > But are you really breaking the 2 GB barrier with your documents? I run a 64 bit OS... Might as well run 64 bit software, but I don't mind running 32 bit. In any case, OOo starts to get glitchy with Docs with more than 32000 pages and they are hard to save :) tim -- --------------------------------------------------------- Tim Fairchild Atchafalaya Border Collies. Kuttabul, Queensland, Australia. --------------------------------------------------------- Email mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage http://www.bcs4me.com Photos http://www.pbase.com/amosf Blog http://bcs4me.com/blog --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
